Use of organizational instrument management of social responsibility on transport enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/pte.v0i15.134883

Keywords:

transport enterprises, socially responsible activity, controlling system, a balanced system of indicators, strategic development

Abstract

Goal. Obtaining new knowledge on the development of the scientific direction "ensuring the management of socially responsible activity controlling tools" both in the theoretical and practical plane. Method. To formalize an effective strategy for the development of a transport company, it is proposed to use the following methods: modeling and analyzing causal relationships between strategic goals; systems of balanced indicators (key indicators, centers of responsibility); development of procedures, forms of presentation, methods of planning, collection and processing of key indicators values; the definition of ways to bring the strategy to the managers and employees of all structural units and to coordinate the system of motivation based on the results of the balancing of indicators; formation of recommendations for changing the system of indicators when viewing the strategy; ranking of strategic projects; automation of planning, collection and processing of indicators values. Results. The authors suggest using the system of balanced indicators, linking strategic goals, indicators of their achievement and tactical actions on social responsibility depending on the degree of its integration into the system of strategic management. Scientific novelty. The authors carried out studies in the field of transport on the basis of consideration of theoretical and applied bases of organizational tools for ensuring the management of socially responsible activity. An analysis of effective tools for managing socially responsible activity has proven that the most promising for further research will be topics related to the accounting and control of socially responsible activities. Practical significance. The system is aimed at the implementation of ideas and principles of social responsibility in the practical activities of the enterprise to achieve strategic goals, the possibility of dialogue with interested parties and confirmation of the fulfillment of obligations assumed by them.

Author Biographies

B. Andrushkiv, Ternopil National Technical University named after Ivan Puluj

Scientific and Technical Library

O. Pavlykivska, Ternopil National Technical University named after Ivan Puluj

Scientific and Technical Library

References

СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ

Логутова Т.Г. Сучасний стан транспортної інфраструктури України / Т.Г. Логутова, М.М. Полторацький // Теоретичні і практичні аспекти економіки та інтелектуальної власності. – 2015. – Випуск 2(12), Том2. – С. 8-14.

Стратегічні напрями розвитку транспортної галузі України у післякризовий період: аналіт. доп. / Д. К. Прейгер, О. В. Собкевич, О. Ю. Ємельянова; за заг. ред. Я. А. Жаліла. – К. : НІСД, 2012. – 112 с.

Державна служба статистики України [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://ukrstat.gov.ua.

Концепція розвитку транспортно-дорожнього комплексу України на середньостроковий період та до 2020 року. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://mtu.gov.ua.

Keynes J.M. The End of Laissez-faire. (1926). Essays in Persuasion / J.M. Keynes. - London, 1931. – p. 314-315.

Freeman R.E. The stakeholder approach revisited / R.E. Freeman // Zeitschrift fur Wirtschafts und Unternehmensethik. – 2004. – Vol. 5. – №3. – Р. 228-241.

Post J.E. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth / J.E. Post, L.E. Preston, S. Sachs. – Stanford University Press: Stanford, 2002. – Р. 321-341.

Maignan I. Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: the case of the United States and France / I. Maignan, O. Ferrell // Journal of Business Ethics. – 2000. – Vol. 23. – №3. – P. 283-297.

References

Loghutova, T. G., & Poltoracjkyj, M. M. (2015). Suchasnyj stan transportnoji infrastruktury Ukrajiny. Teoretychni I Praktychni Aspekty Ekonomiky Ta Intelektualjnoji Vlasnosti, 2(2(12)), 8-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.31498/2225-6407.12.2015.76032

Prejgher, D. K., Sobkevych, O. V., Jemeljjanova, O. J., & Zhalil, J. A. (2012). Strateghichni naprjamy rozvytku transportnoji ghaluzi Ukrajiny u pisljakryzovyj period: Analit. dop. Kyiv, Ukraine: NISD.

Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrajiny. (n.d.). Retrieved June 23, 2018, from http://ukrstat.gov.ua.

Koncepcija rozvytku transportno-dorozhnjogho kompleksu Ukrajiny na serednjostrokovyj period ta do 2020 roku. (n.d.). Retrieved June 23, 2018, from http://mtu.gov.ua

Keynes, J. M. (1926). The End of Laissez-faire. In Essays in Persuasion (pp. 314-315). London.

Freeman, R. E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift Fur Wirtschafts Und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 228-241.

Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283-297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006262325211

Issue

Section

Статті